Search

The Market Looks Toward a Post-COVID Economy

By nearly every measure, 2020 was an unprecedented year. In our Q1 2020 letter from mid‐April, we noted that over 1.9 million people had been infected with COVID‐19 globally with over 127,000 deaths. As of February 3, 2021, over 100 million cases have been reported and more than 2 million have died. In the U.S. alone there have been over 26 million reported cases and over 450,000 deaths – far and away the global leader in both categories. We all know families who have been touched by this crisis, and our thoughts are with everyone who has been affected. With the prospect of mass vaccinations around the corner, and the number of daily infections beginning to drop, our hope is that we begin to turn the corner in the coming months. In the meantime, we encourage everyone to continue to stay vigilant and safe.


In this letter, we review some economic and market trends of 2020 and examine if they hold hints of what’s to come in the year ahead.

Figure 1: U.S. unemployment stands at 6.7% after peaking at nearly 15% in April 2020. Source: Fortune.

Wall Street vs Main Street. It is a well-worn phrase that “the stock market is not the economy” and 2020 was a stark illustration of this. In addition to the large number of infections and deaths due to the pandemic, the economic toll of coronavirus has been severe. The U.S. unemployment rate hit nearly 15% in April 2020 (the highest since 1939), ending the year at 6.7%, nearly double the rate at the beginning of the year (see Figure 1). The Congressional Budget Office predicts that the number of employed Americans will not return to pre-pandemic levels until 2024. Much of the job loss can be attributed to the shuttering of small businesses – Oxxford Information Technology estimates that approximately 4 million U.S. businesses closed in 2020, including many small businesses where the impact of the economic shutdown was too great to bear.

Figure 2: U.S. GDP fell 3.5% in 2020, the largest drop since the end of WWII. Source: CNBC.

Measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), the U.S. economy has been on a wild ride over the past year. GDP shrank by 31.4% in the second quarter of 2020 (the largest quarterly economic contraction since the Great Depression), only to rebound in the third quarter, gaining 33.4%. Still, while GDP rose another 4% in the fourth quarter, that was not enough to net annualized growth, with the economy shrinking 3.5% in 2020 (see Figure 2).


The stock market, on the other hand, saw incredible growth and resilience in 2020 even in the face of the pandemic. The steepest bear market in history, with the S&P 500 Index falling over 33% from February 19 to March 23, also turned out to be the third shortest – about five months later, the S&P 500 Index (along with many other major market indices) fully recovered its losses. Despite notable volatility in the second half of 2020, markets ended the year at record highs, with the S&P 500 Index rising approximately 70% since its March low to finish up over 18%.

Figure 3: The “FAANG+M” stocks all outperformed the S&P 500 Index in 2020 and thus, were significant contributors to the S&P 500’s positive return. Data Source: Portfolio Visualizer.

“Stay-at-home” stocks dominated. In fact, all major global indices were positive in 2020, but the tech-heavy NASDAQ index, posting a +43% return, led the charge. Investors, spurred by fiscal stimulus and historically low interest rates, poured money into companies that stood to benefit from the shift towards at-home consumption. As an example, the so-called “FAANG+M” stocks (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google/Alphabet and Microsoft) rebounded from their March lows in an extraordinary fashion, outpacing the S&P 500 for the year (see Figure 3). In fact, just three large tech companies – Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple – accounted for over half of the return of the S&P 500 in 2020.


As regular readers of our quarterly letters know, while the pandemic exacerbated the phenomenon, the dominance of the S&P 500 by a handful of tech behemoths predates 2020. Our second-quarter letter from 2018 examined the concentration of the FAANGs in the S&P 500 – because the S&P 500 is market-cap weighted, the largest companies in the index contribute more to the index’s overall return. Back in June 2018, the FAANG+M stocks accounted for approximately 14% of the weight of the S&P 500. As of December 31, 2020, those same six companies now account for nearly 24% of the index. In fact, the weight of the 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 has been steadily increasing since 2014, only falling off a record high in the last few months of 2020 (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: The weight of the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 has been increasing over the past five years. Source: JPMorgan.

Signs of a broadening market? This recent decrease in the concentration of the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 coincided with a rotation away from the “growthy” FAANGs and towards value stocks and cheaper sectors. Value indices outperformed growth indices in the fourth quarter across all geographies and market cap segments. While this may be short-lived, there are some reasons to suggest otherwise. For one, as demonstrated by the disparity between stock market highs and the less rosy economic health of the country, the stock market is forward-looking – investors may be signaling that the sectors and companies that are historically cheap (travel-related businesses, energy, banks, traditional retail, etc.) will rebound as vaccines are rolled out and people are eager to leave their homes again.

Figure 5: The weights of the stocks in the market-cap weighted S&P 500 Index (in blue) are concentrated in the largest companies while they are evenly distributed in the equal-weighted index. Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices.

We also see evidence that the market is not just shifting from growth to value stocks, but also to smaller companies beyond the mega-cap FAANGs. This is well-illustrated by examining the performance of equal-weighted indices. As mentioned above, major market indices are typically market-cap weighted – as the market capitalization of each company in the index rises and falls, so does its overall weight in the index. In this way, the largest companies in the index contribute the most to the return of the index. In contrast, the weights of stocks within an equal-weighted index do not change over time. Instead, each stock is held at the same weight, with the index rebalanced (typically quarterly) to ensure all index constituents have equal influence on the overall performance of the index (See Figure 5). In this way, the smallest companies in the index contribute as much to performance as the largest.


As you would expect, because just a handful of the largest companies in the index have been the best performers, the market-cap weighted S&P 500 has outperformed the equal-weighted index over the past decade. However, over the longer term, the equal-weighted S&P 500 has actually outperformed the market-cap weighted index (by nearly 200 basis points annualized over 20 years, for example), suggesting that a market dominated by just a few massive winners is not the norm and is likely unsustainable. In fact, charting the relative cumulative outperformance of the equal-weighted S&P 500 against the market-cap weighted index over time, and comparing it to the concentration of the top five names in the market-cap weighted index shows this dynamic at play – as market concentration falls, the equal-weighted index outperforms the market-cap weighted index (see Figure 6). This was the case in the fourth quarter of 2020, with the equal-weighted S&P 500 outperforming the market-cap weighted index by over 600 basis points. Other major market indices performed similarly – for example, the equal-weighted MSCI All Country World Index also outperformed its market-cap weighted counterpart in the fourth quarter. Investor flows into equal-weighted ETFs have greatly increased beginning in the last few months of 2020, a trend that has continued into 2021 – another sign that perhaps the market expects a post-COVID recovery to benefit smaller cap companies in neglected sectors more than the already pricy FAANGs.

Figure 6: When market concentration (blue) falls, the equal-weighted S&P 500 Index outperforms the market-cap weighted index (cumulative outperformance in yellow). Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices.

We agree and believe that a broadening market is healthier than one dominated by just a handful of stocks and is an environment that favors skilled active managers. In this way, our client’s portfolios are well-positioned. In addition to exposure to some extraordinarily high-quality, but inexpensive value stocks, we have marginally increased our exposure to U.S. small cap stocks over the past six months. Domestic small cap stocks outperformed U.S. large cap by a substantial margin in the fourth quarter of 2020, with the Russell 2000 Index returning 31.37% against the S&P 500 return of 12.15%. We are also continuing to look outside of the public markets to private investments where the return potential can be greater, and managers can find outstanding opportunities to buy good assets at cheap prices in a difficult economic climate.


While the world may never fully return to “normal,” we do expect a decent rebound in global demand– smart investors with an eye toward company fundamentals should be able to take advantage of this. In that context, we close with a few thoughts on the recent “Reddit herd” in the markets (i.e., internet chat board-fueled stock “manipulation” of names like GameStop and American Airlines). In short, we do not expect this phenomenon to be a major systemic risk to the markets overall. In fact, in talking with investment managers, the consensus view is that large swings in prices away from stock fundamentals can create attractive, long-term investment opportunities.


2021 Client Conference Reminder. As we mentioned in our last letter, we plan to hold this year’s Mangham Client Conference virtually through a series of webcasts. Please stay tuned for more details – we are excited to share our plans with you soon with the first webinar this spring.


As always, we hope you remain healthy and safe. We would love to hear from you and welcome conversation – reach out to us anytime you would like to chat.


Best Regards,


The Mangham Associates Team










© 2021 Mangham Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.


For institutional or accredited investors only. Confidential – Not for reproduction or distribution.


The information presented should not be considered an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any particular security. Any such offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to purchase may be made only by means of the delivery of a confidential offering memorandum, which will contain material information not included herein regarding, among other factors, risk and potential conflicts of interest. This presentation should not be used as the sole basis for making a decision to invest with Mangham. In making an investment decision, you must rely on your own examination of the offering. You should not construe the contents of this letter as legal, tax, investment, or other advice, or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. No assurance can be given that investment objectives will be achieved.


Opinions expressed herein are those of Mangham Associates, and there is no assurance that any predicted results will actually occur. The information contained herein is based on sources believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy is not guaranteed.


This document contains information about possible or assumed future results of general economic conditions. “Forward‐looking statements” are based on assumptions that Mangham Associates believes to be reasonable but are not guarantees of results.


Unless otherwise noted, all returns are net of manager fees, and client managed total returns are net of Mangham Associates’ advisory fee. Additional information, including advisory fees and expenses, is provided on Mangham’s Form ADV Part 2A. Performance data is unaudited and subject to change. It is not possible to invest directly in an index and unmanaged indices do not incur fees and expenses.


Indices


Indices are used for benchmarking purposes and do not necessarily represent the same diversification or weightings as Mangham's various composites. It is not possible to invest directly in an index and unmanaged indices do not incur fees and expenses.


MSCI Global Investable Market Indices – The indices are constructed to provide exhaustive coverage of the investable opportunity set with non-overlapping size and style segmentation. A strong emphasis is placed on investability and replicability of the indices through the use of size and liquidity screens. Source and use of MSCI Data: Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI). MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or redisseminated in any form and may not be used to create any financial instruments or products on any indices. This information is provided on an “as is” basis, and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of this information. Neither MSCI, any of its affiliates or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such information or the results to be obtained by the use thereof, and MSCI, its affiliates and each such other person hereby expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating this information have any liability for any direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including, without limitation, lost profits), even if notified of, or if it might otherwise have anticipated, the possibility of such damages.


Russell® Indices – The indices are constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer for the various segments in the U.S. equity market.


S&P 500® – Measures the performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. S&P® and S&P 500 are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, and Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. © 2021 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, its affiliates and/or its licensors. All rights reserved.


Performance data quoted represent past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results.


Recent Posts

See All